TrekUnited Forum: Rate "Caretaker" - TrekUnited Forum

Jump to content

             

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2

Rate "Caretaker"

Poll: How much did you like "Caretaker"? (32 member(s) have cast votes)

How much did you like "Caretaker"?

  1. 10 (3 votes [9.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.38%

  2. 9 (3 votes [9.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.38%

  3. 8 (7 votes [21.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.88%

  4. 7 (10 votes [31.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.25%

  5. 6 (2 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  6. 5 (3 votes [9.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.38%

  7. 4 (3 votes [9.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.38%

  8. 3 (1 votes [3.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.12%

  9. 2 (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  10. 1 (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Dr. Phlox Icon

  • The Opinionist
  • Group: SaveEnterprise Alumni
  • Posts: 3,493
  • Joined: 11-February 05
  • Location:MIA
  • Interests:Ack, so many things!

Posted 25 April 2005 - 03:47 PM

I gave it an 8. It was more interesting than DS9's pilot. Though, not as good as Enterprise's. And, Kes had that horrible wig...
Posted Image
0

#2 User is offline   Captain_Hair Icon

  • Master of all things, jack of none
  • View gallery
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 50,337
  • Joined: 27-February 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 25 April 2005 - 03:50 PM

It was just that gigantic plot hole (granted, the whole series would have been different otherwise), but couldn't Janeway have placed timed charges on the Caretaker's Array, had it send Voyager back, and then automatically detonate.
*kaboom*
End of series. :P
Posted Image
0

#3 User is offline   Cougar Icon

  • fsfafsfdyryrhgf
  • Group: SaveEnterprise Alumni
  • Posts: 24,610
  • Joined: 16-February 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 April 2005 - 03:51 PM

Not too bad, not sure where it would fit on a scale from 1 to 10.

Kes was a pointless character ;)
Posted Image

"We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people."
- Gen Hillier, Chief of the Defence Staff
0

#4 User is offline   Mc Douglas Icon

  • Fleet Admiral
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,420
  • Joined: 10-February 05
  • Location:Bonn, Germany
  • Interests:Supporting Trek United; Star Trek; Cinema; Ancient cultures

Posted 25 April 2005 - 03:52 PM

Captain Hair, on Apr 25 2005, 10:50 PM, said:

It was just that gigantic plot hole (granted, the whole series would have been different otherwise), but couldn't Janeway have placed timed charges on the Caretaker's Array, had it send Voyager back, and then automatically detonate.
*kaboom*
End of series. :P
View Post

Asked myself the same thing. Voyager had great potential, but the authors did not use it. :(
"Sag mal Atan, das Ganze war doch wohl nur ein böser Traum, oder? - Viel schlimmer, das war Science Fiction." (Raumpatrouille Orion)

"I've always wondered why it's okay for football fans to go to a football game with their faces painted and sloshing beer around and that's considered old fashioned American fun. Yet someone dressing as a Klingon is considered weird. You don't see Star Trek fans after a convention running through the streets and turning over cars or breaking windows in a drunken haze. Star Trek fans benevolent optimistic and incredibly intelligent."
(Manny Coto 02/23/05)

Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   Dr. Phlox Icon

  • The Opinionist
  • Group: SaveEnterprise Alumni
  • Posts: 3,493
  • Joined: 11-February 05
  • Location:MIA
  • Interests:Ack, so many things!

Posted 25 April 2005 - 03:59 PM

Kes was a godess, man. Kim is the ultimate pointless! :P
Posted Image
0

#6 User is offline   Cougar Icon

  • fsfafsfdyryrhgf
  • Group: SaveEnterprise Alumni
  • Posts: 24,610
  • Joined: 16-February 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:01 PM

Dr. Phlox, on Apr 25 2005, 04:59 PM, said:

Kes was a godess, man.  Kim is the ultimate pointless! :P
View Post

Kes: Oh look I can do stuff with my mind, oh and plant plants ;)
Posted Image

"We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people."
- Gen Hillier, Chief of the Defence Staff
0

#7 User is offline   Dr. Phlox Icon

  • The Opinionist
  • Group: SaveEnterprise Alumni
  • Posts: 3,493
  • Joined: 11-February 05
  • Location:MIA
  • Interests:Ack, so many things!

Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:16 PM

Kim: "Oh, look. I'm still an ensign. Oh, look. I'm still hopelessly naive."
Posted Image
0

#8 User is offline   NX01 Icon

  • Vice Admiral
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,013
  • Joined: 08-April 05

Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:25 PM

I gave it a 7.

One thing about this that annoyed me. The Tricobolt devices were seen in this ep and then they were never seena again.

WTF?
Art Department
Flash Programming Team

Posted Image

Legends Never Die...
0

#9 User is offline   Captain_Hair Icon

  • Master of all things, jack of none
  • View gallery
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 50,337
  • Joined: 27-February 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:28 PM

NX01, on Apr 25 2005, 05:25 PM, said:

I gave it a 7.

One thing about this that annoyed me. The Tricobolt devices were seen in this ep and then they were never seena again.

WTF?
View Post

It's just like the Enterprise-E in Nemesis exhausting it's compliment of photon torpedoes.

PHOTON?!?!?

What happened to those happy little quantum torpedoes in First Contact?
Posted Image
0

#10 User is offline   T'Pel Icon

  • Rear Admiral
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 858
  • Joined: 20-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ljubljana - Slovenia - EU - Earth - Sector 001
  • Interests:Star Trek, Military History, Computers, Airsoft

Posted 25 April 2005 - 06:20 PM

Captain Hair, on Apr 25 2005, 09:28 PM, said:

It's just like the Enterprise-E in Nemesis exhausting it's compliment of photon torpedoes.

PHOTON?!?!?

What happened to those happy little quantum torpedoes in First Contact?
View Post


that's what i'd like to know to - btw i gave it an 8 ...
National Sub-Coordinator For Slovenia
Posted Image
Memorium credit for Gene Roddenberry during the opening of TNG's Unification, Part I
0

#11 User is offline   Dr EMH Icon

  • Commander
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: 03-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 25 April 2005 - 11:34 PM

NX01, on Apr 26 2005, 05:25 AM, said:

One thing about this that annoyed me. The Tricobolt devices were seen in this ep and then they were never seena again.
View Post

Tricobolt device appears in another ep (can't recall the name, I think it's called Conspiracy or what) where Seven assimilate too much ship and personnel logs and start to imagine conspiracy everywhere ... she conclude Tuvok failed to fire enough yield on the tricobolt torpedo to destroy Caretaker's array completely and that it's a Federation conspiracy to invade the Delta Qaudrant ... <_<

Anyway, I only give Caretaker a rating of 6 ... b'cos no Seven-of-Nine, hehe :lol:
I'm a doctor, not a door stop. [ST:FC]

Singapore Star Trek Fansite ... www.startrek.sg ... for the fans, by the fans.
0

#12 User is offline   T'Pel Icon

  • Rear Admiral
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 858
  • Joined: 20-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ljubljana - Slovenia - EU - Earth - Sector 001
  • Interests:Star Trek, Military History, Computers, Airsoft

Posted 26 April 2005 - 06:44 AM

Dr EMH, on Apr 26 2005, 04:34 AM, said:

Tricobolt device appears in another ep (can't recall the name, I think it's called Conspiracy or what) where Seven assimilate too much ship and personnel logs and start to imagine conspiracy everywhere ... she conclude Tuvok failed to fire enough yield on the tricobolt torpedo to destroy Caretaker's array completely and that it's a Federation conspiracy to invade the Delta Qaudrant ...  <_<

Anyway, I only give Caretaker a rating of 6 ... b'cos no Seven-of-Nine, hehe  :lol:
View Post


you mean "The Voyager Conspiracy"? But in that show we only see the tricobolt devices used in "Caretaker" and not new ones .... :huh:
National Sub-Coordinator For Slovenia
Posted Image
Memorium credit for Gene Roddenberry during the opening of TNG's Unification, Part I
0

#13 User is offline   NX01 Icon

  • Vice Admiral
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,013
  • Joined: 08-April 05

Posted 26 April 2005 - 09:11 AM

Captain Hair, on Apr 25 2005, 09:28 PM, said:

It's just like the Enterprise-E in Nemesis exhausting it's compliment of photon torpedoes.

PHOTON?!?!?

What happened to those happy little quantum torpedoes in First Contact?
View Post


We do see the Quantum Torpedoes fired in Nemesis. When Deanna said "NOW!" you saw 3 of them strike the Schmitar and reveal the ship.
Art Department
Flash Programming Team

Posted Image

Legends Never Die...
0

#14 User is offline   Dr. Phlox Icon

  • The Opinionist
  • Group: SaveEnterprise Alumni
  • Posts: 3,493
  • Joined: 11-February 05
  • Location:MIA
  • Interests:Ack, so many things!

Posted 26 April 2005 - 03:00 PM

Why do they always fire in threes?
Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   Captain_Hair Icon

  • Master of all things, jack of none
  • View gallery
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 50,337
  • Joined: 27-February 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 26 April 2005 - 03:04 PM

Dr. Phlox, on Apr 26 2005, 04:00 PM, said:

Why do they always fire in threes?
View Post

Military tactic. You're more likely to hit, and to negate possible duds.
The M-16A2 semi-automatic rifle has three modes, three round burst, single shot, and safe.
Posted Image
0

#16 User is offline   Darth Buddha Icon

  • Rear Admiral
  • Group: SaveEnterprise Alumni
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 10-February 05
  • Location:Outta here

Posted 26 April 2005 - 03:12 PM

Captain Hair, on Apr 26 2005, 08:04 PM, said:

Military tactic. You're more likely to hit, and to negate possible duds.
The M-16A2 semi-automatic rifle has three modes, three round burst, single shot, and safe.
View Post

True of manually fired weapons.. three is the magic number for most instructors (though I believe I've heard of folks whe prefer two), but that's because by the fourth shot recoil has usually taken you off target.

I don't know that this would apply to a torpedo!
0

#17 User is offline   Captain_Hair Icon

  • Master of all things, jack of none
  • View gallery
  • Group: VIP
  • Posts: 50,337
  • Joined: 27-February 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 26 April 2005 - 03:15 PM

Darth Buddha, on Apr 26 2005, 04:12 PM, said:

True of manually fired weapons.. three is the magic number for most instructors (though I believe I've heard of folks whe prefer two), but that's because by the fourth shot recoil has usually taken you off target.

I don't know that this would apply to a torpedo!
View Post

It is, but I don't think the recoil from an 'impelled' torpedo would be enough to knock a starship off balance. And besides, the torpedoes have onboard guidance systems!
Posted Image
0

#18 User is offline   NX01 Icon

  • Vice Admiral
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,013
  • Joined: 08-April 05

Posted 27 April 2005 - 04:19 AM

If I remember correctly from the Star Trek Encyclopedias. Both the Enterprise-D and E and fire a full spread of 12 photon or Quantum torpedoes simultaiously or in sequence.
Art Department
Flash Programming Team

Posted Image

Legends Never Die...
0

#19 User is offline   Maco Captain Icon

  • Commodore
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 539
  • Joined: 03-August 07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 August 2007 - 12:57 PM

I gave it a 9!! Not perfect, but close. :lol:
0

#20 User is offline   CharlieTucker Icon

  • Fleet Captain
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 456
  • Joined: 03-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northeast, USA

Posted 08 August 2007 - 08:16 AM

I give it a 7. Not bad but needed a little work. Janeway acted to hastily in destroying the array. She could have found a way of destroying it and get Voyager home.
Let's Roll
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise. The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc. Trekunited.com is owned and operated by The Federation (formerly known as The International Federation of Trekkers).
- Forum designed and built by Thomas Moore -